|
Until 1933, only the eldest brother was entitled to marry within the Namboothiri
caste. His younger brothers were supposed to practice pure "Brahmacharyam"
by being unmarried and to dedicate themselves to preserve Vedams and rituals.
The eldest brother was supposed to marry for building up future generations.
The younger sons were meant for inheriting the Vedic traditions from their
ancestors and passing it on to their future generations (the eldest brother
also had a major role in preserving the Vedic tradition) Apart
from this, those younger brothers, who opted to marry within the caste were
excommunicated (Bhrastu) from the family. By putting such pressures,
the elders in the community might have thought that, the younger brothers
would concentrate on their traditional job of practising bachelorhood,
preserving and transmitting Vedams. Except for a few intelligent and studious ones,
most younger brothers turned to more lucrative and worldly affairs like
Sambandham.
Other communities, especially Nayars and Kshathriyas encouraged Namboothiris
to have Sambandham with girls in their communities. The objective behind
this encouragement was to "purify" their future generations with the Namboothiri
blood and also to elevate their families to higher levels in the society
due to a Namboothiri relationship. It was a fact that Namboothiris could
not just resist such attractions in terms of money, sex and leisurely life-style.
Namboothiris thus married Kshathriya (Kovilakams, royal families), Nayar,
Warrier, and Pisharoti girls and the children from such marriage alliances
belonged to the matrilineal (Marumakkathaayam) lineage of their mothers.
This, interestingly, led to situations like a Nayar son of a Namboothiri
could not eat or bathe with his father, or a Namboothiri could not eat food
prepared by his Nayar wife. Namboothiri Spinsters remained abandoned in the
community. Namboothiri Yogakshema Mahaasabha ( Click here ), a revolutionary group of Namboothiris and
founded in 1908, took a decision in 1919 and agitated for marriage of all
Namboothiris within the community. Sabha declared
the marriages of younger brothers from within the community as official,
irrespective of whether the elder brothers were married or not. This
revolutionary meeting was held in "Bharatheebhooshanam" at Thrissur on 25th
Medam 1094 (1919 A.D.). The aim was embodied in the Madras Namboothiri
Act of 1933. In the same year, the Madras Marumakkathaayam Act was passed,
by which Sambandham was considered as a regular marriage, conferring
on the children the same rights of inheritance and property as held by
children whose parents were both Namboothiris. The declaration and these
Acts led to a sudden decline in the number of Sambandham marriages, and this unethical practice ended shortly (in about ten years). Following
these acts, Namboothiri land was increasingly partitioned and property dispersed.
The stoppage of Sambandham led to a liberation of Namboothiri wives and
girls. They were the major sufferers due to unavailability of Namboothiri
boys for marriage because of the practices of polygamy and parallel Sambandhams
by elder sons.
Due to the dispersal of properties, financially sound Namboothiri families
became middle class while middle class families became poor. Financially
poor families really struggled to cope up with the new environment. As
a result, most Namboothiri youths had to leave their Vedic education
and practice and switch over to modern (formal) education and profession.
Intelligence and a simple life-style were the only tools the youths inherited, except a few from financially upper middle class families.
The Thrissur Brahmaswam Madhom, which was originally founded in the seventh
century to teach Rigvedam, offered free food and stay to these studious
boys. Most of these boys later became executives and professionals and
took their families financially back to middle or upper middle class, while
a minority of them miserably failed in formal education also. Some barely managed
with income from priesthood in temples. The 1963 Kerala
Land Reforms Act and the 1970 amendment of it added oil to flame. Under
the original Act, cultivating tenants were made eligible to purchase the
right, title and interest from the landlord. They could exercise this right
by applying to a land tribunal. Except the properties of a few landlords
who anticipated such an Act, the leased properties of Namboothiris were
lost to tenants, and this further reduced the income of Namboothiris. The 1970
amendment of the Act clarified that this procedure was applicable if the
owner of the land was a religious, charitable or educational institution.
The net result was that most temples also lost their income and so did
the poor and temple-dependent Namboothiris.
Due to such uncertainties and sudden decline of income from priesthood,
most Namboothiri youngsters lost interest in Vedic culture and ritual performances.
But a very few members of equally small number of families stood firm against
all such tides throughout the twentieth century, and finally ended up as the torch-bearers of Vedic Namboothiri culture. Prominent
among them are the families of Cherumukku Vaidikan and Thekkat Vaidikan
(both of Sukapuram Graamam). Some of the recently expired Vedic experts
include Erkkara Raman Namboodiri and Naraas Somayaaji. A very few families
still keep the tradition of "Agnihothram". Pioneer among them is the Maarath
Kavapra Mana at Edapal in Malapuram district. The Saamavedi doyen family Nellikkattil
Mammannu Mana has a rare achievement that its three successive generations,
all christened Neelakandhan, have performed Athiraatram in the 20th century;
in 1901, 1918 and in 1956.
According to Erkkara Raman Namboodiri as quoted by Frits Staal, more than
120 Agnishtoma (somayaagam) and five Atiratra-agnicaya (Athiraathram) have
been performed between 1911 and 1970. The last Athiraathram was performed
in Paanjaal (near Thrissur) in 1975. Athiraathram was performed 18 times
during the last 125 years and six times during the last 75 years.
Edited
by: P.Vinod Bhattathiripad
Reference : "Agni" by Frits Staal, Asian Humanities Press, Berkeley, Calif., USA, 1983. Some of the ideas in the above article were directly taken from this book. |
|